Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:27 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> My questions are trying to understand the timing. Basically whether a) >> 6.0.18 went out with TCK failures or b) you fixed the failures as part of >> the 6.0.18 release or c) some change in svn post 6.0.18 caused the >> failures. It wasn't clear to me which it was. > > Not certain about 6.0.18 (I think it should be ok, though), but it's > most definitely after the latest fix that I used my hack, and it worked.
6.0.18 is OK. The EL tests all pass. >> Your most recent message makes things clear that it is c). It looks like >> the new fix for 42565 still has some issues. It's good to know that a new >> javacc / lookahead 3 should fix it but I would like to understand why if >> only to avoid breaking EL again with any future change. > > I don't really know what I am doing with that EL parser, so no idea > about optimal parameters. You know about as much as me then ;) I still get the problems with the latest javacc so it must be your look ahead change that fixed it. I do get a couple of look ahead warnings when I run javacc so I am going to see if I can put in explicit fixes for those warnings rather than setting the look ahead globally. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
