Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:44 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> If you used a newer javacc and/or changed the lookahead for the 6.0.18 >> release that would have resulted in updated .java files. So again, my >> question is why aren't the updated .java files in svn. > > Because as I said, I don't wish to. I have no idea what is the good > value for that lookahead thing (I did try it due to a warning during > code generation), I'm just trying to help by pointing out a hack I did.
Did you include that in the 6.0.18 release or was it just something you did locally? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]