+1 No regressions found with this final TomEE+ 1.6.0 with our products, tested on Windowses, Linuxes, AIX & Solarises (Sparc & x64).
Alex On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Jon > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. > > > > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 > > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like > we're > > good to go. > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > - > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ > > > > Binaries: > > > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > Tag: > > > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a > > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can > collect > > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. > > > > If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new > > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first > set > > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a > negative. > > Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their > choosing > > to make up for their lost time. :) > > > > > > -David > > > > >
