+1

LieGrue,
strub





>________________________________
> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
>To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <dev@tomee.apache.org> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
>Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> 
>
>Ok!  All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
>I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries.  I 
>ran these through the TCK and all is green.  Looks like we're good to go.
>
>Maven Repo:
>
>- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
>
>Binaries:
>
>- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
>
>Tag:
>
>- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
>
>
>The vote will go for 72 hours.  Any -1s in this time will be seen as a 
>positive.  The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect all 
>possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
>
>If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new 
>binaries and start a new 72 hour vote.  If you didn't look at the first set of 
>binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative.  
>Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing to 
>make up for their lost time. :)
>
>
>-David
>
>
>

Reply via email to