Ok guys, no worries. Consensus, so keeping rules are already defined. JLouis
-- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > @Thiago: the issue I spoke about @Suppress is the code can evolve and it > can hide some important stuff (saw it a lot with @Suppress(eclipse stuff) > users) > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-05-23 14:45 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > > -1 this is really too error prone. > > > > People keep adding lines via patches and voila all your code is broken... > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > On Friday, 23 May 2014, 11:19, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hey guys, > > > > > >Is it possible to restore the ability to have inline if? > > >I like them cause I think it's more readable, especially to write pre > > >condition at the beginning of methods. > > > > > >For instance ... > > >if (bla == null) return; > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > >-- > > >Jean-Louis Monteiro > > >http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > >http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > >
