Yes but it is a bit antinatural if all other methods follows the getter/setter, maybe a setter and an append methid in case of properties could have more sense.
El dc., 17 juny 2015 a les 11:16, Romain Manni-Bucau (<[email protected]>) va escriure: > Not sure i got it. You use getProperties to mutate it > Le 17 juin 2015 10:01, "Alex Soto" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi, currently I am developing an application which I am registering > > dynamically resources using Assembler class. > > > > I have seen that AbstractService has a field called properties that you > can > > only get information from it but not set it. All other fields has its own > > getter/setter except this one. I think that if there is nothing against > it > > it should have a setter too so I can dynamically set properties too. > > > > The class is here: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/sys/AbstractService.java > > > > I can provide a PR if you agree. > > > > Alex. > > >
