Yes and no. It is javadoc-ed and consistent in our "jaxb tree". Le 17 juin 2015 10:19, "Alex Soto" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Yes but it is a bit antinatural if all other methods follows the > getter/setter, maybe a setter and an append methid in case of properties > could have more sense. > > El dc., 17 juny 2015 a les 11:16, Romain Manni-Bucau (< > [email protected]>) > va escriure: > > > Not sure i got it. You use getProperties to mutate it > > Le 17 juin 2015 10:01, "Alex Soto" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > Hi, currently I am developing an application which I am registering > > > dynamically resources using Assembler class. > > > > > > I have seen that AbstractService has a field called properties that you > > can > > > only get information from it but not set it. All other fields has its > own > > > getter/setter except this one. I think that if there is nothing against > > it > > > it should have a setter too so I can dynamically set properties too. > > > > > > The class is here: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/sys/AbstractService.java > > > > > > I can provide a PR if you agree. > > > > > > Alex. > > > > > >
