2018-03-06 9:11 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:

> The point is: you cannot pass the mp TCKs with Java7 but only with Java8.
>
> But if you run the release with Java8 then there is a high chance that the
> generated bytecode will not run on Java7 anymore.
> So until we drop Java7 officially (and move to a TomEE-7.1.0 version) we
> have to run the release build on Java7.
>

That is no more true today since we worked to make it possible cleaning up
bad typings but the point is highly valid.


>
> That's why I suggested to only ship MP with TomEE8.
>

+1


>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 06.03.2018 um 08:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > 2018-03-06 8:22 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >
> >> Did we already solve the Java8 question?
> >>
> >
> > Nop but not a blocker for java 8
> >
> >
> >> Because if we add MP then you cannot build with Java7 anymore.
> >>
> >
> > We fixed all the java8/7 build time incompatibilities so we can (now,
> agree
> > we need to ensure it is still the case but ATM we dont need buildchain to
> > do it).
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Lg strub
> >>
> >> Mit autocorrect gesendet
> >>
> >>> Am 05.03.2018 um 22:31 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Le 5 mars 2018 22:07, "Jonathan Gallimore" <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> >> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Le 5 mars 2018 21:35, "Jonathan Gallimore" <
> >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> >>>> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>> The name "MicroProfile" suggests an element of being small, so I'm not
> >>>> sure why we'd only add this to our biggest distribution and no where
> >> else.
> >>>> I've built the change (thanks for the help Roberto), and it adds
> <100KB
> >> to
> >>>> the binary. I'd definitely add it to Plus and Plume, but I think we
> >> should
> >>>> either add it web profile, or if we really don't want it in
> WebProfile,
> >> I
> >>>> see no harm in an extra flavour that is webprofile + microprofile.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok for plume and plus for me, please not to WP.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Would you be ok with the MP profile then? Seems like reasonable middle
> >>> ground. Without that, folks who want "Micro"Profile features would be
> >>> forced to use the biggest flavours.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yep, as mentionned no issue to have a new distro ;).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Open point: should it be switchable to off even if provided in case it
> >>>> breaks apps?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm ok with that.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to