We can certainly continue discussing, but there have been 7.1 discussions including people like Rudy, Jean-Louis and Jonathan volunteering on list to work on a 7.1. Mark raising some questions and chiming in with "I fully support that."
This is finger-in-the-wind observation of positive response and certainly there is still room for other feedback. What would you recommend we do from here? -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On May 1, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which leads to the same David, no? > There is no decision taken and no real argument - before your mail - for a > 7.1. > Either there are too much off list discussions or we should better handle > thread outcomes cause ATM, if you follow the list, discussions and acts are > not consistent :(. > > Le 1 mai 2018 21:24, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were willing to > do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a problem. > > Note, just got off the MicroProfile hangout and there we've proposed to > doing both a MicroProfile 1.4 and MicroProfile 2.0 release on June 6th. > The release contents would be the same with the exception of the minimum > Java EE version; 1.4 will remain at Java EE 7 and MicroProfile 2.0 will be > Java EE 8. Work would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x afterwards, > though future MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component specs > want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE dependency > at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: > > - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1) > - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakarta EE 8, TomEE 8 > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread have >> been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges ;))? >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > ee-8-high-performance> >> >> 2018-04-30 16:34 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi community, >>> >>> I have created a branch based on current master (aka TomEE 7.0.x) as >>> discussed a while back. >>> >>> I have backported the microprofile JWT work from TomEE 8 branch. >>> The branch is https://github.com/jeanouii/tomee/tree/microprofile_ > backport >>> I have pushed what I have currently in there. I'll need to test more >>> deeply. >>> >>> JLouis >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>
