guess we can just use the master release note since the last release and drop the spec N+1 items no? +1 to get it merged (I'd appreciate if Mark can give a shot before since it is a big one but looked ok and well working on my side)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-05-04 12:11 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> : > I took the approach Romain suggested, but I completely agree with the JIRA > for release notes, so I'll get those sorted out. Thanks Mark! > > Jon > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hell yes, this damn GitHub PRs. Totally splits the communities. > > Either it spams us or we loose information :( > > > > I'm all for keeping our stuff on JIRA and our own mailing lists. > > > > Will look at it and apply it. > > We need JIRA tickets nonetheless. Otherwise we cannot craft any release > > notes. > > > > What I did for OWB-1.7.5 is to just add this version to the original > > tickets. > > So if you only backported existing JIRA tickets, then please do me a > > favour and add the 1.0.1 version to them. > > > > txs and LieGure, > > strub > > > > > Am 04.05.2018 um 12:02 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore < > > [email protected]>: > > > > > > Here's the PR for reference: https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/21 > > > > > > Romain gave it a thumbs-up. I'll try and get those JIRA references > today. > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> I submitted a PR for Johnzon, and owe some JIRA references. I don't > > think > > >> it has been merged yet. I'm definitely not expecting you or Romain to > do > > >> the work alone. Thanks for the OWB releases! > > >> > > >> Jon > > >> > > >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Mark Struberg > > <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Folks, can we FIRST focus on getting TomEE-7.0.5 done? > > >>> > > >>> We agreed that we FIRST do 7.0.5, and only THEN ship TomEE-7.1 in a > > >>> branch and move TomEE8 to master. > > >>> > > >>> I've now released OWB-1.7.5, next up is Johnzon-1.0.1. > > >>> Are all the fixes for Johnzon already applied and all the patches > > >>> shipped? I've not seen them yet. And Romain and I cannot do all the > > work > > >>> alone. Or rather it will take a bit time then. > > >>> And the last puzzle part is OpenJPA-2.4.3 and 3.0.0. > > >>> > > >>> So please less talking, more hacking. > > >>> > > >>> txs and LieGrue, > > >>> strub > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wednesday, 2 May 2018, 07:07:54 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Just take this one: > > >>> > > >>> " > > >>> Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is > > cool. > > >>> And I fully support that. > > >>> " > > >>> > > >>> Not at all "I fully support TomEE 7.1 for MP". > > >>> > > >>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not against 7.1, I even proposed something > very > > >>> closed months ago (before we got the 8 branch) but I'm against > > creating a > > >>> branch and play with the versioning policy until we can justify it by > > >>> something affecting users+being justified technically. > > >>> I don't think we got here yet. > > >>> Take it as "how would it affect users?"+"how does it affects us?". > > First > > >>> answer is clearly "no impact" - we are already in prod with j8 - and > > last > > >>> one is pretty much the same technically AFAIK. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8- > > >>> high-performance> > > >>> > > >>> 2018-05-02 0:42 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > >>>> Could I ask for an off-topic personal favor? Sometimes your email > > >>> replies > > >>>> come with no quoting at all and the only way to find your words is > to > > >>> read > > >>>> both the old and new emails and do a mental diff. > > >>>> > > >>>> I've been tested a few times for dyslexia and don't have it, but my > > >>>> reading speed is very impaired regardless. If you can help me by > > taking > > >>>> care to ensure there is proper quoting, I'd be deeply appreciative. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> David Blevins > > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>> > > >>>>> On May 1, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Le 1 mai 2018 23:08, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a > > >>> écrit : > > >>>>> > > >>>>> We can certainly continue discussing, but there have been 7.1 > > >>> discussions > > >>>>> including people like Rudy, Jean-Louis and Jonathan volunteering on > > >>> list > > >>>> to > > >>>>> work on a 7.1. Mark raising some questions and chiming in with "I > > >>> fully > > >>>>> support that." > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This is likely reading only the part you wanted ;). Mark always put > > >>> some > > >>>>> conditions to that, JL doesnt care much from what i read and to > play > > >>> the > > >>>>> same "finger in the wind" game I think Rudy - correct me if Im > wrong > > - > > >>>>> would support any technical solution leading to a mp distro. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This is finger-in-the-wind observation of positive response and > > >>> certainly > > >>>>> there is still room for other feedback. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> What would you recommend we do from here? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> First we need to clearly state what is the difference between a 7.1 > > >>> and > > >>>> 8. > > >>>>> All i read was a half baked 8 (so 8 from our last months > discussions) > > >>> or > > >>>> a > > >>>>> 7+mp which doesnt work if we want to do a 7+some ee 8. MP not > driving > > >>>> tomee > > >>>>> by design (and it is good), it shouldnt imply any versioning to > stay > > >>>>> consistent for end users. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Technically we can do a mp distro on tomee 7.0 (using toolchain) > > >>> and/or > > >>>>> tomee 8.0 (natively). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Keep in mind it is as minor for the project as the plume distro - > we > > >>> can > > >>>>> even do a "all permutations distro" update on 7.0 and 8.0. It is > far > > >>> to > > >>>>> modify the project nature, goal or codebase. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Once we know what we want to bring then we can go through the > > standard > > >>>>> process of a vote if people disagree or just move forward. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> David Blevins > > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On May 1, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>> [email protected]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Which leads to the same David, no? > > >>>>>> There is no decision taken and no real argument - before your > mail - > > >>>> for a > > >>>>>> 7.1. > > >>>>>> Either there are too much off list discussions or we should better > > >>>> handle > > >>>>>> thread outcomes cause ATM, if you follow the list, discussions and > > >>> acts > > >>>>> are > > >>>>>> not consistent :(. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Le 1 mai 2018 21:24, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a > > >>> écrit > > >>>> : > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were > > >>> willing > > >>>> to > > >>>>>> do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a > > >>>>> problem. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Note, just got off the MicroProfile hangout and there we've > proposed > > >>> to > > >>>>>> doing both a MicroProfile 1.4 and MicroProfile 2.0 release on June > > >>> 6th. > > >>>>>> The release contents would be the same with the exception of the > > >>> minimum > > >>>>>> Java EE version; 1.4 will remain at Java EE 7 and MicroProfile 2.0 > > >>> will > > >>>> be > > >>>>>> Java EE 8. Work would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x > > afterwards, > > >>>>>> though future MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component > > >>> specs > > >>>>>> want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE > > >>>>> dependency > > >>>>>> at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1) > > >>>>>> - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakarta EE 8, TomEE 8 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> David Blevins > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>> [email protected] > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the > thread > > >>> have > > >>>>>>> been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges > ;))? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > > >>>>>> rmannibucau> | > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > > >>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 2018-04-30 16:34 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>> : > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi community, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I have created a branch based on current master (aka TomEE > 7.0.x) > > >>> as > > >>>>>>>> discussed a while back. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I have backported the microprofile JWT work from TomEE 8 branch. > > >>>>>>>> The branch is https://github.com/jeanouii/ > > tomee/tree/microprofile_ > > >>>>>> backport > > >>>>>>>> I have pushed what I have currently in there. I'll need to test > > >>> more > > >>>>>>>> deeply. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > > >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > >>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
