Enormous +1 for Mark's suggestion (i.e., TomEE 7.0.5 focus before releasing anything else) :)
Alexandre 2018-05-04 11:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > Folks, can we FIRST focus on getting TomEE-7.0.5 done? > > We agreed that we FIRST do 7.0.5, and only THEN ship TomEE-7.1 in a branch > and move TomEE8 to master. > > I've now released OWB-1.7.5, next up is Johnzon-1.0.1. > Are all the fixes for Johnzon already applied and all the patches shipped? > I've not seen them yet. And Romain and I cannot do all the work alone. Or > rather it will take a bit time then. > And the last puzzle part is OpenJPA-2.4.3 and 3.0.0. > > So please less talking, more hacking. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > On Wednesday, 2 May 2018, 07:07:54 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just take this one: > > " > Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is cool. > And I fully support that. > " > > Not at all "I fully support TomEE 7.1 for MP". > > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against 7.1, I even proposed something very > closed months ago (before we got the 8 branch) but I'm against creating a > branch and play with the versioning policy until we can justify it by > something affecting users+being justified technically. > I don't think we got here yet. > Take it as "how would it affect users?"+"how does it affects us?". First > answer is clearly "no impact" - we are already in prod with j8 - and last > one is pretty much the same technically AFAIK. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > 2018-05-02 0:42 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <[email protected]>: > >> Could I ask for an off-topic personal favor? Sometimes your email replies >> come with no quoting at all and the only way to find your words is to read >> both the old and new emails and do a mental diff. >> >> I've been tested a few times for dyslexia and don't have it, but my >> reading speed is very impaired regardless. If you can help me by taking >> care to ensure there is proper quoting, I'd be deeply appreciative. >> >> >> -- >> David Blevins >> http://twitter.com/dblevins >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> > On May 1, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Le 1 mai 2018 23:08, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> > >> > We can certainly continue discussing, but there have been 7.1 discussions >> > including people like Rudy, Jean-Louis and Jonathan volunteering on list >> to >> > work on a 7.1. Mark raising some questions and chiming in with "I fully >> > support that." >> > >> > >> > This is likely reading only the part you wanted ;). Mark always put some >> > conditions to that, JL doesnt care much from what i read and to play the >> > same "finger in the wind" game I think Rudy - correct me if Im wrong - >> > would support any technical solution leading to a mp distro. >> > >> > >> > This is finger-in-the-wind observation of positive response and certainly >> > there is still room for other feedback. >> > >> > What would you recommend we do from here? >> > >> > >> > First we need to clearly state what is the difference between a 7.1 and >> 8. >> > All i read was a half baked 8 (so 8 from our last months discussions) or >> a >> > 7+mp which doesnt work if we want to do a 7+some ee 8. MP not driving >> tomee >> > by design (and it is good), it shouldnt imply any versioning to stay >> > consistent for end users. >> > >> > Technically we can do a mp distro on tomee 7.0 (using toolchain) and/or >> > tomee 8.0 (natively). >> > >> > Keep in mind it is as minor for the project as the plume distro - we can >> > even do a "all permutations distro" update on 7.0 and 8.0. It is far to >> > modify the project nature, goal or codebase. >> > >> > Once we know what we want to bring then we can go through the standard >> > process of a vote if people disagree or just move forward. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > David Blevins >> > http://twitter.com/dblevins >> > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >> >> On May 1, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Which leads to the same David, no? >> >> There is no decision taken and no real argument - before your mail - >> for a >> >> 7.1. >> >> Either there are too much off list discussions or we should better >> handle >> >> thread outcomes cause ATM, if you follow the list, discussions and acts >> > are >> >> not consistent :(. >> >> >> >> Le 1 mai 2018 21:24, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit >> : >> >> >> >> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were willing >> to >> >> do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a >> > problem. >> >> >> >> Note, just got off the MicroProfile hangout and there we've proposed to >> >> doing both a MicroProfile 1.4 and MicroProfile 2.0 release on June 6th. >> >> The release contents would be the same with the exception of the minimum >> >> Java EE version; 1.4 will remain at Java EE 7 and MicroProfile 2.0 will >> be >> >> Java EE 8. Work would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x afterwards, >> >> though future MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component specs >> >> want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE >> > dependency >> >> at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: >> >> >> >> - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1) >> >> - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakarta EE 8, TomEE 8 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Blevins >> >> http://twitter.com/dblevins >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> >>> On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> > >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread have >> >>> been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges ;))? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> >> rmannibucau> | >> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >> >> ee-8-high-performance> >> >>> >> >>> 2018-04-30 16:34 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> [email protected] >> >> : >> >>> >> >>>> Hi community, >> >>>> >> >>>> I have created a branch based on current master (aka TomEE 7.0.x) as >> >>>> discussed a while back. >> >>>> >> >>>> I have backported the microprofile JWT work from TomEE 8 branch. >> >>>> The branch is https://github.com/jeanouii/tomee/tree/microprofile_ >> >> backport >> >>>> I have pushed what I have currently in there. I'll need to test more >> >>>> deeply. >> >>>> >> >>>> JLouis >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >>>> >> >>
