Hi Thomas, I pushed 2.0.1 as that's the last version that doesn't have the regression BVAL-174.
Once the build passes, would you like the honor to submit a patch to upgrade to 2.0.3? The primary thing is we need someone to either delete or fix the failing example. Ideally there would also be an update to its README that talks about the change in behavior. Is that something you'd be willing to contribute? -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Aug 5, 2019, at 11:16 AM, Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I would like to release 2.0.3, as it contains some fixes and performance > boosts, if you are ok with using the official bval > > Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo., 5. Aug. > 2019, 18:24: > >> Following up on this thread. >> What version would you recommend? >> >> On Maven central we have >> https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.bval >> I believe it's 2.0.2 but wanted to double check >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Thomas Andraschko < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> there were some "possible issues" with bval in the last months, >> especially: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-174 >>> (also see https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01042.html >> ) >>> >>> and >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BVAL/issues/BVAL-175 >>> >>> both are no issues from our perspective @bval side (please feel free to >>> join the discussions there). >>> >>> I would really like to see the bval upgrade for the next milestone or >> even >>> the final release. >>> If you are ok with the upgrade, we would prepare a bval release. >>> >>> It's a big boost in the startup performance and with those changes, we >>> almost have the same startup time as with 7.x. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Thomas >>> >>
