Merged and ticket closed.
Thanks
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:56 PM Thomas Andraschko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> PR here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/538
>
> Am Di., 13. Aug. 2019 um 04:29 Uhr schrieb David Blevins <
> [email protected]>:
>
> > > On Aug 12, 2019, at 5:39 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Started the release vote today, will come back when it's released :)
> >
> > Awesome.  Note that the 2.0.2 release has the regression, so you could do
> > the harder part of the change now if you wanted.  The primary thing
> needed
> > is someone who understands what changed in BVal to explain it to the
> world
> > and guide people towards any workarounds.
> >
> > Here is the example in question which is about 8 years old.  Anyone who
> > will be hit by the issue probably followed this example at one point or
> > another, so this would be a good place to document a workaround.
> >
> >  -
> >
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/examples/bean-validation-design-by-contract
> >
> > This is the example that will fail on bval 2.0.2 or the coming 2.0.3.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> > > [email protected]>:
> > >
> > >> Im in Holiday this week, so If you can work on it Mark, it would be
> > great
> > >> :)
> > >>
> > >> Mark Struberg <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 6. Aug.
> 2019,
> > >> 08:41:
> > >>
> > >>> I can probably help with that a bit. Just ping me if you need
> > something.
> > >>>
> > >>> LieGrue,
> > >>> strub
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Am 05.08.2019 um 20:16 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>> [email protected]>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I would like to release 2.0.3, as it contains some fixes and
> > performance
> > >>>> boosts, if you are ok with using the official bval
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo., 5.
> > Aug.
> > >>>> 2019, 18:24:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Following up on this thread.
> > >>>>> What version would you recommend?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Maven central we have
> > >>>>> https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.bval
> > >>>>> I believe it's 2.0.2 but wanted to double check
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > >>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> there were some "possible issues" with bval in the last months,
> > >>>>> especially:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-174
> > >>>>>> (also see
> > >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01042.html
> > >>>>> )
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BVAL/issues/BVAL-175
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> both are no issues from our perspective @bval side (please feel
> free
> > >>> to
> > >>>>>> join the discussions there).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I would really like to see the bval upgrade for the next milestone
> > or
> > >>>>> even
> > >>>>>> the final release.
> > >>>>>> If you are ok with the upgrade, we would prepare a bval release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> It's a big boost in the startup performance and with those
> changes,
> > we
> > >>>>>> almost have the same startup time as with 7.x.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to