Started the release vote today, will come back when it's released :)

Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
[email protected]>:

> Im in Holiday this week, so If you can work on it Mark, it would be great
> :)
>
> Mark Struberg <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 6. Aug. 2019,
> 08:41:
>
>> I can probably help with that a bit. Just ping me if you need something.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> > Am 05.08.2019 um 20:16 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
>> [email protected]>:
>> >
>> > I would like to release 2.0.3, as it contains some fixes and performance
>> > boosts, if you are ok with using the official bval
>> >
>> > Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo., 5. Aug.
>> > 2019, 18:24:
>> >
>> >> Following up on this thread.
>> >> What version would you recommend?
>> >>
>> >> On Maven central we have
>> >> https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.bval
>> >> I believe it's 2.0.2 but wanted to double check
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Thomas Andraschko <
>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> there were some "possible issues" with bval in the last months,
>> >> especially:
>> >>>
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-174
>> >>> (also see
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01042.html
>> >> )
>> >>>
>> >>> and
>> >>>
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BVAL/issues/BVAL-175
>> >>>
>> >>> both are no issues from our perspective @bval side (please feel free
>> to
>> >>> join the discussions there).
>> >>>
>> >>> I would really like to see the bval upgrade for the next milestone or
>> >> even
>> >>> the final release.
>> >>> If you are ok with the upgrade, we would prepare a bval release.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's a big boost in the startup performance and with those changes, we
>> >>> almost have the same startup time as with 7.x.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Thomas
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to