I’ve discovered that the svn repo automatically converts .mdtext files to .html, so my conclusions about how much of tomee-site are currently published are wrong. I’ll redo my calculations.
Thanks David Jencks > On Feb 16, 2020, at 8:40 AM, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’d like some verification that my conclusions about content are reasonable…. > > The content sources I know about are: > > tomee (7-8 docs and examples) > > tomee-site-generator (older content) > > tomee-site (?) > > My understanding is the site is published using svnpubsub, so that svn repo > reflects what is actually visible on the site. > > After doing some set arithmetic I’ve discovered that there is no content on > the current site necessarily from tomee-site; there’s a lot of overlap in > content between tomee-site and tomee-site-generator, but nothing from > tomee-site that is missing from tomee-site-generator is on the website. > > Is this reasonable? > > Is there anything from tomee-site not currently published that _should_ be > added to the site? According to my calculations, there are about 445 pages > in tomee-site that aren’t currently published. > > If anyone wants to study the situation, I recommend looking at my git repos > where all the content I’ve found is similarly organized, and the summary in > comparison.json > <https://github.com/djencks/tomee/blob/antora/docs/comparison.json> > > calculated using old-new-compare.js > <https://github.com/djencks/tomee/blob/antora/docs/old-new-compare.js> > > There’s also quite a bit of content with no source; as I’ve mentioned before > I think this is a never-cleaned-up leftover from a previous version of the > site. > > Thanks > David Jencks > > ps. by “necessarily” I mean all the pages in svn that could have come from > tomee-site, could also have come from tomee-site-generator. I don’t really > know where they actually came from, although I could probably calculate it. > > pps. For nitpickers: there may appear to be two unique files at tomee-site. > One, security/index, is the same as security/security; I’ve provided a > redirect. The other, documentation, is some sort of site index or navigation > page, possibly generated. I heavily edited the version in my repo before > realizing it was not needed as-is.
