Hi, I think, that Alpine would be a great addition to shrink the images sizes if it isn't too much work.
I am also wondering, if we should provide a Semeru/OpenJ9 runtime - but I guess, that there isn't too much need for it, so it is super low prio :D Gruß Richard Am Freitag, dem 29.04.2022 um 21:18 +0000 schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod): > Hello all, > > There is more information on the PR I noted earlier. > > Essentially, OpenJDK 17 is being dereplicated. In addition OpenJDK 8 > and OpenJDK 11, "are not updated on an extreme priority." > > Given this new information, I propose the following: > Move immediately to Temurin for Java 17. (There have been many +1 > votes for this) > We add a Temurin option for Java 8 and 11 should we lose support for > those. We would still leave OpenJDK as the default. > > These additional images will be using Ubuntu as the OS for > Temurin. OpenJDK will stay with Debian. As long as we are on the > topic of OS, there has been demand for Alpine for smaller images. I > am also willing to add an Alpine option. > > I am going to start on these this weekend in hope of having a PR > ready for review middle of next week. > > If anyone has thoughts or comments, please chime in. > > Thanks, > Rod. > > > On 4/27/22, 6:22 PM, "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or > responding. (Sender: > [email protected]) > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > > > All, > > I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We > need to choose a different JDK to run on our docker images. > > At the moment I'm not sure what all the choices are. When I > looked at this before, I suggested Eclipse Temurin. > > Does anyone have a preference or others to consider? > > Thanks, > Rod. > > > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/pull/495 >
