Richard,

I am fine with providing a Semeru/OpenJ9.  Would we want that or 8, 11, and 17?

I do not see an alpine image, so it would just be adding a ubuntu image.

Rod.


On 4/30/22, 1:30 AM, "Zowalla, Richard" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use 
CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. (Sender: 
[email protected])

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Hi,

    I think, that Alpine would be a great addition to shrink the images
    sizes if it isn't too much work.

    I am also wondering, if we should provide a Semeru/OpenJ9
    runtime - but I guess, that there isn't too much need for it, so it is
    super low prio :D

    Gruß
    Richard



    Am Freitag, dem 29.04.2022 um 21:18 +0000 schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J
    (Rod):
    > Hello all,
    > 
    > There is more information on the PR I noted earlier.
    > 
    > Essentially, OpenJDK 17 is being dereplicated.  In addition OpenJDK 8
    > and OpenJDK 11, "are not updated on an extreme priority."
    > 
    > Given this new information, I propose the following:
    > Move immediately to Temurin for Java 17.  (There have been many +1
    > votes for this)
    > We add a Temurin option for Java 8 and 11 should we lose support for
    > those.  We would still leave OpenJDK as the default.
    > 
    > These additional images will be using Ubuntu as the OS for
    > Temurin.  OpenJDK will stay with Debian.  As long as we are on the
    > topic of OS, there has been demand for Alpine for smaller images.  I
    > am also willing to add an Alpine option.
    > 
    > I am going to start on these this weekend in hope of having a PR
    > ready for review middle of next week.
    > 
    > If anyone has thoughts or comments, please chime in.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Rod.
    > 
    > 
    > On 4/27/22, 6:22 PM, "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <
    > [email protected]> wrote:
    > 
    >     Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
    > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
    > responding. (Sender: 
    > [email protected])
    > 
    >     -----------------------------------------------------------------
    > -------------
    > 
    > 
    >     All,
    > 
    >     I was notified of the pull request below.  Long story short:   We
    > need to choose a different JDK to run on our docker images.
    > 
    >     At the moment I'm not sure what all the choices are.   When I
    > looked at this before, I suggested Eclipse Temurin.
    > 
    >     Does anyone have a preference or others to consider?
    > 
    >     Thanks,
    >     Rod.
    > 
    > 
    >     https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/pull/495
    > 

Reply via email to