Hi Rod, You won't find any Semeru/OpenJ9 image based on Alpine, because this JVM is not supporter on Alpine (alas...)
Thanks, Alex Le sam. 30 avr. 2022 à 18:10, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Richard, > > I am fine with providing a Semeru/OpenJ9. Would we want that or 8, 11, and > 17? > > I do not see an alpine image, so it would just be adding a ubuntu image. > > Rod. > > > On 4/30/22, 1:30 AM, "Zowalla, Richard" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use > CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. > (Sender: [email protected]) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Hi, > > I think, that Alpine would be a great addition to shrink the images > sizes if it isn't too much work. > > I am also wondering, if we should provide a Semeru/OpenJ9 > runtime - but I guess, that there isn't too much need for it, so it is > super low prio :D > > Gruß > Richard > > > > Am Freitag, dem 29.04.2022 um 21:18 +0000 schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J > (Rod): > > Hello all, > > > > There is more information on the PR I noted earlier. > > > > Essentially, OpenJDK 17 is being dereplicated. In addition OpenJDK 8 > > and OpenJDK 11, "are not updated on an extreme priority." > > > > Given this new information, I propose the following: > > Move immediately to Temurin for Java 17. (There have been many +1 > > votes for this) > > We add a Temurin option for Java 8 and 11 should we lose support for > > those. We would still leave OpenJDK as the default. > > > > These additional images will be using Ubuntu as the OS for > > Temurin. OpenJDK will stay with Debian. As long as we are on the > > topic of OS, there has been demand for Alpine for smaller images. I > > am also willing to add an Alpine option. > > > > I am going to start on these this weekend in hope of having a PR > > ready for review middle of next week. > > > > If anyone has thoughts or comments, please chime in. > > > > Thanks, > > Rod. > > > > > > On 4/27/22, 6:22 PM, "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL > > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or > > responding. (Sender: > > [email protected]) > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------- > > > > > > All, > > > > I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We > > need to choose a different JDK to run on our docker images. > > > > At the moment I'm not sure what all the choices are. When I > > looked at this before, I suggested Eclipse Temurin. > > > > Does anyone have a preference or others to consider? > > > > Thanks, > > Rod. > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/pull/495 > > >
