@1: Maybe start a separate thread for [DISCUSSION] ? From my pov a stable version of openjpa would be sufficient (even if it isn't compliant)
@2: Same. Just needs a release, imho (but might depend on old stuff, don't know) @3: Concurrency: You can find a DRAFT PR with the Concurrency TCK here: [1] There are some new features: [2] The stub impl / changes are here: [3] [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1084 [2] https://jakarta.ee/specifications/concurrency/3.0/ [3] https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/main/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/threads Am Sonntag, dem 07.01.2024 um 18:40 +0100 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > 1) OpenJPA: couldnt we just set EclipseLink as our default for now? > We dont > need to remove it, but leaving it as default is not a good decision. > 2) BatchEE: Is there a alternative impl for now available? I can try > to > migrate BatchEE to jakarta later but for now the highest prio for me > and my > company to migrate to a EE10 container. > 3) Concurency: Can you point me to the sources? I will try to work on > it > upcoming week. > > Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla < > rich...@zowalla.com>: > > > I have tested a custom TomEE 10 build (with fixed deps) for quite a > > while > > now and it worked for my usecases. > > > > What needs to be done (imho): > > > > - We need to have stable versions for BatchEE and OpenJPA. > > Currently, they > > are only SNAPSHOT. > > > > - Implement the concurrency changes. Currently, they are only added > > as > > stub impls. (I am not using that in my test env, so didn't > > encounter issues) > > > > - TCK still hangs but isn't a blocker for a milestone imho. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > Am 5. Januar 2024 10:40:05 MEZ schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > > > i would like to have everything apache, too but i think our goal > > > must be > > to > > > get a TomEE10-M1 release out ASAP. > > > we can later easily make openjpa the default again. > > > > > > how should we proceed here? > > > i have some time slots to work on something and provide PRs, we > > > just need > > > some decisions. > > > > > > > > > Am Mo., 20. Nov. 2023 um 23:12 Uhr schrieb Jonathan S. Fisher < > > > exabr...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > If my opinion counts for anything, I'd love for TomEE to be > > > > based on > > > > Apache Foundation projects as much as possible. With JPA itself > > > > is > > > > just a large spec to cover, I can understand OpenJPA not having > > > > a > > > > current spec implementation and am still thankful for the past > > > > efforts > > > > of the committers on that project. My second choice would be > > > > EclipseLink over Hibernate, mainly because of speed, but also > > > > because > > > > many of the app servers in the space are already Weld + > > > > Hibernate + > > > > other various Redhat derivative projects. TomEE by far is > > > > enormously > > > > faster on startup and execution speed than OpenLiberty or > > > > WildFly > > > > (deploying the exact same WAR) and I'd be sad to lose that. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:46 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Thomas for pointing this out. > > > > > -- > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:06 PM Richard Zowalla > > > > > <r...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Great news ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 20.11.2023 um 16:05 +0100 schrieb Thomas > > > > > > Andraschko: > > > > > > > JFYI: https://in.relation.to/2023/11/18/license/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it seems they would like to move to another license > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis > > > > > > > Monteiro < > > > > > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://hibernate.org/community/license/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most Hibernate projects are released under LGPL v2.1 > > > > > > > > <https://opensource.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1>. > > > > > > > > Only some sub projects are ASL v2 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:12 PM Thomas Andraschko < > > > > > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > isnt hibernate licensed under Apache2.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:10 Uhr schrieb Swell < > > > > > > > > souheil.sul...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because of licenses we cannot ship with hibernate. > > > > > > > > > > Better be > > > > > > > > éclipselink > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > avoid license hell. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue 7 Feb 2023 at 16:08, Thomas Andraschko < > > > > > > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AFAICS OpenJPA isnt in real active development > > > > > > > > > > > and doenst > > > > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > support > > > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > JPA 2.2 features. > > > > > > > > > > > Whats your plan for it? > > > > > > > > > > > Can't we just use Hibernate as default? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jonathan | exabr...@gmail.com > > > > Pessimists, see a jar as half empty. Optimists, in contrast, > > > > see it as > > > > half full. > > > > Engineers, of course, understand the glass is twice as big as > > > > it needs > > to > > > > be. > > > > > >
