Oliver Braun wrote: > Hi *, > > Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Stephan Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> If we want features like linkoo, first make the code ready for >>> them. (Maybe I was in a rush when I introduced osl_loadModuleRelative, >>> maybe some vnd.sun.star.expand:$WHATEVER-PREFIX scheme would be >>> better. I am very open for discussion about *that*.) >>> >> Fine with me. I'm not insisting on the current solution, only pointing >> out that triple copying around of files (local output -> solver -> >> installation tree) is a major PITA and plainly non-obvious for new >> developers. >> >> So, constructive ideas, anybody? > > What are the reasons (again) why shared libraries and dlls aren't directly > created in solver instead of the modules local output tree ?
I assume mainly the fact that Hamburg developers don't have write access to solver when building non-locally. ;-) Besides I think it's just because nobody asked for it and now it's quite some work to change the build system in a way that "deliver" is incorporated into it (there's more than just dlls to build). Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
