Hi Kendy,
    Are you starting the spliting OOo now?
What is  the first thing that we should do for this splitting?
Do you think what is the better way to do this job? 

Regards,
Xiuzhi
  Hi,

  During the OOoCon, Petr had a presentation about the OOo package splitting.  
  The most important part for a (Linux) package maintainer was to be able to 
  build parts of OpenOffice.org separately; the thing is that with all the 
  localizations, we are unable to get the build times under some 7 hours.  But 
  the build could be done nicely in parallel (on the level of machines, not 
  processors) if the sources were split correctly, with correct rpms and -devel 
  rpms [of course, applies to debs as well ;-)].  And of course, the -noarch 
  parts like the translations could be built just once for all architectures.

  I propose the following split of the sources [the sizes are of the unpacked 
  sources]:

  75M     ure
  25M     ooo-bootstrap
  141M    ooo-libs-core
  101M    ooo-libs-guitoolkit
  142M    ooo-libs-3rdparty
  17M     ooo-apps-base
  28M     ooo-apps-calc
  38M     ooo-apps-extensions
  14M     ooo-apps-chart
  40M     ooo-apps-impress
  40M     ooo-apps-writer
  59M     ooo-artwork
  107M    ooo-filters
  888M    ooo-l10n
  48M     ooo-sdk
  72M     ooo-testing
  (1.8G   total)

  (See below the content of these tarballs/archives).  I don't want the 
  granularity to be too fine (we would get the modules we have now, but as 
  separate packages), and OTOH the current 5 packages are too few.  The build 
  order of these would be:

  ooo-bootstrap
  ooo-libs-3rdparty
  ure
  ooo-libs-guitoolkit
  ooo-libs-core
  [the rest in whatever sequence/in parallel]

  This would tremendously decrease the learning curve for the new developers as 
  well.  Imagine someone who wants to start hacking on Calc.  Instead of the 
  monster 1.8G sources, he would have to handle 512MB.  Additionally, the goal 
  of the modern Linux distros should be to get rid of the ooo-libs-3rdparty 
  completely - it contains just stuff that is available from other sources 
  anyway [-system stuff], and the distros have packages for them -, thus 
  additional 142M down, doing it just 370M.  And that is much more pleasant, 
  isn't it? ;-)

  Of course, this is not finalized etc. - that's why I'm asking for comments.  
  So far I was able to build in this order with few hacks, eg. scp2 should be 
  split so that the file lists are local, the l10n part must be buildable 
  separtately, etc.

  So - what do you think? ;-)  ooo-l10n in the current proposal contains (in 
  addition to the few modules) all the localize.sdf's - should we split this a 
  bit as well?

  Following is the proposal what I think belongs where:

  ===== ure =====

  bridges
  cli_ure
  codemaker
  cppu
  cppuhelper
  cpputools
  idlc
  io
  javaunohelper
  jurt
  jut
  jvmaccess
  jvmfwk
  offapi
  offuh
  pyuno
  rdbmaker
  registry
  remotebridges
  ridljar
  sal
  salhelper
  stoc
  store
  udkapi
  unoil
  ure
  xml2cmp

  ===== ooo-apps-base =====

  dbaccess
  reportdesign

  ===== ooo-apps-calc =====

  sc

  ===== ooo-apps-extensions =====

  accessibility
  automation
  basctl
  bean
  crashrep
  embedserv
  extensions
  forms
  javainstaller2
  lingucomponent
  MathMLDTD
  package
  setup_native
  UnoControls
  wizards
  xmlsecurity

  ===== ooo-apps-chart =====

  chart2

  ===== ooo-apps-impress =====

  animations
  sd
  slideshow

  ===== ooo-apps-writer =====

  starmath
  sw

  ===== ooo-artwork =====

  default_images
  external_images
  ooo_custom_images

  ===== ooo-bootstrap =====

  config_office
  dmake
  instsetoo_native
  postprocess
  scp2
  solenv
  soltools
  stlport

  ===== ooo-filters =====

  binfilter
  filter
  hwpfilter
  unoxml
  writerfilter
  writerperfect
  xmerge

  ===== ooo-libs-core =====

  avmedia
  basic
  configmgr
  connectivity
  desktop
  embeddedobj
  eventattacher
  fileaccess
  fpicker
  framework
  idl
  linguistic
  officecfg
  oovbaapi
  sandbox
  scripting
  sfx2
  shell
  sj2
  so3
  svx
  sysui
  ucb
  uui
  xmlhelp
  xmloff
  xmlscript
  XmlSearch

  ===== ooo-libs-guitoolkit =====

  basebmp
  basegfx
  canvas
  comphelper
  cppcanvas
  dtrans
  goodies
  i18npool
  i18nutil
  o3tl
  padmin
  psprint
  psprint_config
  regexp
  rsc
  sax
  scaddins
  sot
  svtools
  toolkit
  tools
  transex3
  ucbhelper
  unotools
  vcl
  vos

  ===== ooo-libs-3rdparty =====

  afms
  agg
  beanshell
  berkeleydb
  bitstream_vera_fonts
  boost
  curl
  dictionaries
  epm
  expat
  external
  fondu
  freetype
  hsqldb
  icu
  jfreereport
  jpeg
  libegg
  libtextcat
  libwpd
  libxml2
  libxmlsec
  libxslt
  moz
  msfontextract
  nas
  neon
  np_sdk
  portaudio
  python
  rhino
  sane
  sndfile
  twain
  unixODBC
  vigra
  xalan
  xt
  x11_extensions
  zlib

  ===== ooo-l10n =====

  extras
  helpcontent2
  readlicense_oo

  ===== ooo-sdk =====

  autodoc
  cosv
  odk
  sdk_oo
  udm
  unodevtools

  ===== ooo-testing =====

  qadevOOo
  smoketestoo_native
  testshl2
  testtools

  Regards,
  Jan

Reply via email to