Philipp Lohmann wrote: > Why is it that everybody wants EVERYTHING configurable from with/without > mozilla and we need to cope with every buggy freetype version (as > example, insert your favorite "system" library here), but all of a > sudden it would be considered a good idea imposing a shell on people ? > Hi Philipp,
to give tcsh the justice it deserves, the comparison should rather be between being able to choose freetype (every buggy version) or, lets say, AGG for font rasterization. I believe we want to support every other buggy version of bash... ;) > <sarcasm> > I have a better idea: let's skip that configure crap and instead make > everything that is configurable now a prerequisite. > </sarcasm> > For quite a few prerequisites, that's effectively the case already (java is a case in point I guess). :/ Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
