Hey Dan- I haven’t looked at the RPMs yet, but I think we also need to put up a package for astats.
A few other things: - Package name should have “incubating” in it - Need signatures directly on the release packages (i.e. 1 detached sig per RPM/SRPM), see these: https://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basics On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Leif, we are aware of that and want to get to that point. We've traditionally been Centos-based, and the rpm building is already implemented. That's intended as a nicety to make testing the RC easier.. I, for one, would love to eliminate building rpm's... Dan On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello All, I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1) Changes since 1.7.0: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1 This corresponds to git: Hash: bebf63eedce2d3912752c65b0d52d739f820e0ac Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1 Hmmm, quick question: Why RPMs? That seems pretty restrictive, in that someone could not download / test / look at any of this without having an OS distro that supports RPM… It’d be preferable (IMO at least) to have source artifacts as regular tar-balls (gzip / bzip2’d). Cheers, — Leif
