I think we need to include a source tarball that contains the project name and "incubating" (e.g. traffic_control_incubating_1.8.0_source.tar.gz). We can also include the RPMs but we should note that they are for convenience only and therefore they shouldnt need incubating in the name.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Eric.. > > I'll get the signatures in there, too and look into astats.. > Suggestions on the form of the package name? e.g. > > traffic_ops-incubator-1.8.0-RC1-xxxx.xxxx.x86_64.rpm ? > > -dan > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Dan- > > I haven’t looked at the RPMs yet, but I think we also need to put up a > package for astats. > > > > A few other things: > > - Package name should have “incubating” in it > > - Need signatures directly on the release packages (i.e. 1 detached > sig per RPM/SRPM), see these: > > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid > > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basics > > > > > > On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]<mailto:dang > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi Leif, we are aware of that and want to get to that point. We've > > traditionally been Centos-based, and the rpm building is already > > implemented. That's intended as a nicety to make testing the RC > > easier.. I, for one, would love to eliminate building rpm's... > > > > Dan > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]<mailto:dan > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1) > > > > Changes since 1.7.0: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/ > compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1 > > > > This corresponds to git: > > Hash: bebf63eedce2d3912752c65b0d52d739f820e0ac > > Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1 > > > > > > Hmmm, quick question: Why RPMs? That seems pretty restrictive, in that > someone could not download / test / look at any of this without having an > OS distro that supports RPM… It’d be preferable (IMO at least) to have > source artifacts as regular tar-balls (gzip / bzip2’d). > > > > Cheers, > > > > — Leif > > > > >
