I'm also with Dave on using github (preferably not Jira) for tracking
this..    Some enterprising individual could use the github api to
produce such a report as well showing what's being worked and what
isn't...

-dan

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Dewayne Richardson <dewr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on tracking the Roadmap on Github, the "Labels" in github will make it
> easier to track than a wiki (and even JIRA)
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Shmulik Asafi <shmul...@qwilt.com> wrote:
>
>> I think JIRA/Github are suitable candidates.
>> It will require to decide on some way to tag these items so a convenient
>> filter can produce the desired list (otherwise it will be hidden between
>> lots of JIRAs and no use for anyone)
>>
>> What I personally like about the Wiki option, is that maintaining my list
>> of items will involve only a single page (no mouse clicks); in contrast to
>> JIRA where I'll need to create items and maintain each item in a separate
>> page (many mouse clicks). I'm also more of a list-of-open-bullets guy than
>> a table-with-fixed-columns guy when it comes to viewing information.
>>
>> On the other hand JIRA gives more power when it comes to stuff like
>> order-by filter-by and etc.
>>
>> Ultimately, it's a question of which tool most people imagine will be
>> convenient for them to update and view.
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Dave Neuman <neu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I am probably opening a can of worms that I don't know if I want to open,
>> > but can't we just use Jira for this (and Github once we move there)?  If
>> > someone is working on something it should be in Jira as an issue that
>> > assigned to that person.  From there you can see who is working on what.
>> > It's not going to be perfect, and everything is not always going to be in
>> > there, but it should be good enough IMO.  I think that would be a better
>> > solution than relying on people to keep a wiki up to date.
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Durfey, Ryan <ryan_dur...@comcast.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am +1 on this.  This dovetails well with the idea of a high-level
>> > > roadmap illustrating active areas of work.
>> > >
>> > > I am open to ideas on what tool to use.  I agree with Shmulik we could
>> > > make this work in the wiki if needed.
>> > >
>> > > Ryan Durfey    M | 303-524-5099
>> > > CDN Support (24x7): 866-405-2993 or cdn_supp...@comcast.com<mailto:
>> > > cdn_supp...@comcast.com>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From: Shmulik Asafi <shmul...@qwilt.com>
>> > > Reply-To: "dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org" <
>> > > dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org>
>> > > Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 11:54 PM
>> > > To: "dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org" <
>> > > dev@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org>
>> > > Subject: TC Contributers to Publish list of Planned/WIP Items for
>> Better
>> > > Community Sync
>> > >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > During the summit I've suggested to a few people that maybe each TC
>> > > contributer should publish a list of the items she's working on
>> presently
>> > > and planning to work on in the near future.
>> > >
>> > > The goal is to share what "major stuff" is going to happen in the
>> project
>> > > (e.g. Jeff's work on Localized/Edge Traffic Routing; Derek's work on
>> > > Delivery Service configuration; Dave/Matt's work on Lua scripts; etc.).
>> > >
>> > > I think this is very little effort by each contributer and will allow
>> us
>> > to
>> > > be much more synced, make it possible to engage with existing efforts
>> and
>> > > provide a platform to detect conflicting/duplicated efforts. I also
>> think
>> > > this can be a first baby step towards building a roadmap in the long
>> > term.
>> > >
>> > > The few people I talked with seemed open to this idea. I hope others
>> will
>> > > feel the same.
>> > >
>> > > I think Wiki pages is the best place for this, but it can also be in
>> > > JIRA/Git, or whatever appropriate tools Apache provides (it would also
>> be
>> > > cool if we could make RSS feed no changes).
>> > >
>> > > What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > If all support, I'd be happy to create the "framework" for this in
>> > whatever
>> > > tool we choose.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > *Shmulik Asafi*
>> > > Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221692 <+972%2072-222-1692>| Mobile:
>> > > +972-54-6581595
>> > > <+972%2054-658-1595>| shmul...@qwilt.com<mailto:shmul...@qwilt.com> <
>> > > y...@qwilt.com<mailto:y...@qwilt.com>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Shmulik Asafi*
>> Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221692| Mobile: +972-54-6581595| shmul...@qwilt.com
>> <y...@qwilt.com>
>>

Reply via email to