We are still using JIRA until we can get "full" github set up.  I believe
Jan put a ticket in with INFRA to get the process started.  It sounded like
it shouldn't take too long, maybe a couple of weeks.



On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Shmulik Asafi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are we still out on JIRA vs. GitHub?
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Jeff Elsloo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Dave sort of implied this already, but in my opinion, we should only
> > use GitHub for the roadmap items if we move all issues there, which
> > will require a vote separate from the roadmap discussion. This makes
> > it more than simply adding a few roadmap items to our project on
> > GitHub, as we have a lot of issues in JIRA that will have to be moved.
> > I'm -1 on maintaining work items in two separate systems, but +1 on
> > tracking the roadmap items in one; JIRA or GitHub.
> >
> > I like the flexibility of a wiki in terms of presentation, but the
> > information can quickly become outdated. It's a secondary system that
> > would require manual updates if/when a roadmap item is worked.
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Dan Kirkwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I'm also with Dave on using github (preferably not Jira) for tracking
> > > this..    Some enterprising individual could use the github api to
> > > produce such a report as well showing what's being worked and what
> > > isn't...
> > >
> > > -dan
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Dewayne Richardson <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> +1 on tracking the Roadmap on Github, the "Labels" in github will make
> > it
> > >> easier to track than a wiki (and even JIRA)
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Shmulik Asafi <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I think JIRA/Github are suitable candidates.
> > >>> It will require to decide on some way to tag these items so a
> > convenient
> > >>> filter can produce the desired list (otherwise it will be hidden
> > between
> > >>> lots of JIRAs and no use for anyone)
> > >>>
> > >>> What I personally like about the Wiki option, is that maintaining my
> > list
> > >>> of items will involve only a single page (no mouse clicks); in
> > contrast to
> > >>> JIRA where I'll need to create items and maintain each item in a
> > separate
> > >>> page (many mouse clicks). I'm also more of a list-of-open-bullets guy
> > than
> > >>> a table-with-fixed-columns guy when it comes to viewing information.
> > >>>
> > >>> On the other hand JIRA gives more power when it comes to stuff like
> > >>> order-by filter-by and etc.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ultimately, it's a question of which tool most people imagine will be
> > >>> convenient for them to update and view.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Dave Neuman <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > I am probably opening a can of worms that I don't know if I want to
> > open,
> > >>> > but can't we just use Jira for this (and Github once we move
> > there)?  If
> > >>> > someone is working on something it should be in Jira as an issue
> that
> > >>> > assigned to that person.  From there you can see who is working on
> > what.
> > >>> > It's not going to be perfect, and everything is not always going to
> > be in
> > >>> > there, but it should be good enough IMO.  I think that would be a
> > better
> > >>> > solution than relying on people to keep a wiki up to date.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Durfey, Ryan <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > I am +1 on this.  This dovetails well with the idea of a
> high-level
> > >>> > > roadmap illustrating active areas of work.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I am open to ideas on what tool to use.  I agree with Shmulik we
> > could
> > >>> > > make this work in the wiki if needed.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Ryan Durfey    M | 303-524-5099
> > >>> > > CDN Support (24x7): 866-405-2993 or [email protected]<
> > mailto:
> > >>> > > [email protected]>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > From: Shmulik Asafi <[email protected]>
> > >>> > > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <
> > >>> > > [email protected]>
> > >>> > > Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 11:54 PM
> > >>> > > To: "[email protected]" <
> > >>> > > [email protected]>
> > >>> > > Subject: TC Contributers to Publish list of Planned/WIP Items for
> > >>> Better
> > >>> > > Community Sync
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Hi All,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > During the summit I've suggested to a few people that maybe each
> TC
> > >>> > > contributer should publish a list of the items she's working on
> > >>> presently
> > >>> > > and planning to work on in the near future.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > The goal is to share what "major stuff" is going to happen in the
> > >>> project
> > >>> > > (e.g. Jeff's work on Localized/Edge Traffic Routing; Derek's work
> > on
> > >>> > > Delivery Service configuration; Dave/Matt's work on Lua scripts;
> > etc.).
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I think this is very little effort by each contributer and will
> > allow
> > >>> us
> > >>> > to
> > >>> > > be much more synced, make it possible to engage with existing
> > efforts
> > >>> and
> > >>> > > provide a platform to detect conflicting/duplicated efforts. I
> also
> > >>> think
> > >>> > > this can be a first baby step towards building a roadmap in the
> > long
> > >>> > term.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > The few people I talked with seemed open to this idea. I hope
> > others
> > >>> will
> > >>> > > feel the same.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > I think Wiki pages is the best place for this, but it can also be
> > in
> > >>> > > JIRA/Git, or whatever appropriate tools Apache provides (it would
> > also
> > >>> be
> > >>> > > cool if we could make RSS feed no changes).
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > What do you think?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > If all support, I'd be happy to create the "framework" for this
> in
> > >>> > whatever
> > >>> > > tool we choose.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thanks!
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > --
> > >>> > > *Shmulik Asafi*
> > >>> > > Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221692 <+972%2072-222-1692>| Mobile:
> > >>> > > +972-54-6581595
> > >>> > > <+972%2054-658-1595>| [email protected]<mailto:shmu
> [email protected]>
> > <
> > >>> > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Shmulik Asafi*
> > >>> Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221692| Mobile: +972-54-6581595|
> > [email protected]
> > >>> <[email protected]>
> > >>>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Shmulik Asafi*
> Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221692| Mobile: +972-54-6581595| [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
>

Reply via email to