Hi, Would this be a reasonable definition of a contributor then
a) Has filed an iCLA AND b1) submitted a patch b2) created or is working on a JIRA b3) worked on documentation, presentations, release management (anything else?) I do feel simply filing an iCLA may not make someone a contributor. There has to be some contribution or intent to contribute. Thank you Suresh On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote: > The second list ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Contributors) > identifies the contributors who have gone the extra mile (show commitment) > and registered themselves and send in their iCLA to the secretary of the > ASF. These contributors have some privileges (e.g. being able to create and > update wiki pages). > > Being in that list is a pre-cursor to becoming a committer (get commit > privileges). > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Gunnar Tapper <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The pom.xml file tracks all. I believe that you must have filed an ICLA > to > > be listed. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Carol Pearson [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:45 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Which contributor list is accurate? > > > > Is this intended to track contributors? Or committers? Those are two > > different sets of people, right? Do we just want the committers on our > > website? Or the more detailed list tracked in #2? > > > > I'm happy with #3, which seems to be the implicit decision, just making > > sure it's explicit here. > > > > -Carol P. > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Gunnar Tapper <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Suresh, > > > > > > I submitted changes to the pom.xml today but did not touch the team > > > entries > > > much. I will remove #2 for the web site instead relying on the > > > auto-generated page from the pom.xml. One fewer place to maintain this > > > information. > > > > > > So, if you can update the pom.xml to match the project page, then we > > > should > > > be good. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Gunnar > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Suresh Subbiah < > > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Gunnar, > > > > > > > > The mentor and committer list at bullet item 3) is accurate. Roberta > > > > updated it recently. > > > > The contributor list in bullet item 2) is the best we have, though I > > > would > > > > like to go through it once more time and compare with JIRA, github & > > > email. > > > > We have not maintained bullet item 1 for a while. If it should be, > > maybe > > > > that should be a JIRA ticket? I can take care of it. > > > > > > > > It will also be good to have a clear definition of who a contributor > > is. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Suresh > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Gunnar Tapper < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I find THREE places where contributors are recorded: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Master pom.xml > > > > > 2. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Contributors > > > > > 3. http://incubator.apache.org/projects/trafodion.html > > > > > > > > > > Which one is the most accurate? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Gunnar > > > > > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're > right.* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Gunnar > > > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* > > > > > >
