Hi Thomas, > I think that an Intake release makes every sense. > As Intake is usually my playground, I'll do the release.
Thanks for taking this over! > I have some adjustments sitting here regarding Velocity 2.0. These are > not yet committed as Velocity 2 needs at least Java 1.7. If you think > that updating the Java requirements in a bugfix release is a good idea > (which I don't), I'm ready to commit the changes. That´s another reason, why I want to release the bugfix release (4.0.1) soon. Java version should not be changed, until this is done - but not very much longer. Your announcements are very welcome, of course! Best regards, Georg Von: Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> An: Turbine Developers List <dev@turbine.apache.org> Datum: 04.02.2018 12:43 Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Fulcrum Intake Release before Turbine 4.0.1? On 02.02.18 10:06, Georg Kallidis wrote: > Fulcrum Security is just released, but not yet Intake. Intake would be > just a bugfix release - or not? Then who may trigger the voting process? > Jeff? I think that an Intake release makes every sense. As Intake is usually my playground, I'll do the release. > We may update the trunk to Java 8 (and update minor/major version number - > we may also create a branch for 4.0.x). I have some adjustments sitting here regarding Velocity 2.0. These are not yet committed as Velocity 2 needs at least Java 1.7. If you think that updating the Java requirements in a bugfix release is a good idea (which I don't), I'm ready to commit the changes. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@turbine.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@turbine.apache.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
