On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:03 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This runs fine for me both before when the distribution was built and >> trying again now, both times with a clean repo with both Sun and IBM JDKs so >> i guess it must be some environment thing. I'm on WinXP what are you using? >> Did this work for you with RC1? >> >> ...ant >> >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I tried to build the 1.3 tag from scratch and ran into a blocker as >>> reported by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Raymond >>> >>> *From:* ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, July 25, 2008 7:05 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3 RC2 >>> >>> Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for >>> Java 1.3 release. >>> >>> The artifacts are available for review at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC2/> >>> >>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging >>> repository, and eclipse update site. >>> >>> The SVN tag for the release is: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3 >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> > Hi > > What's the state of play here? I see there was a lot of activity on Friday > after I signed off, e.g. [1]. It seems that people got the build working but > the JIRA that was raised [2] is still outstanding? > > Simon > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg01030.html > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498 > I'm leaving the vote open for a bit in the hope of getting some more reviews comments. The fix in trunk for T2498 has not yet been applied to the 1.3 branch though from [1] its probably ok to do that now. It wasn't clear if the problem building binding-ws-axis2 described in that other thread you reference happens in the 1.3 branch, i'd guess it probably does, and there is no fix yet in trunk for it. Building the tag is just one part of the release so would be nice to get some more reviews before respining an RC3 in case there are other issues considered as blocking problems. ...ant [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/h4rmhiionsjchn54
