On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:03 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This runs fine for me both before when the distribution was built and >>> trying again now, both times with a clean repo with both Sun and IBM JDKs so >>> i guess it must be some environment thing. I'm on WinXP what are you using? >>> Did this work for you with RC1? >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I tried to build the 1.3 tag from scratch and ran into a blocker as >>>> reported by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Raymond >>>> >>>> *From:* ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 25, 2008 7:05 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* [Vote] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.3 RC2 >>>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for >>>> Java 1.3 release. >>>> >>>> The artifacts are available for review at: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC2/> >>>> >>>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging >>>> repository, and eclipse update site. >>>> >>>> The SVN tag for the release is: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3 >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>> >>> >> Hi >> >> What's the state of play here? I see there was a lot of activity on Friday >> after I signed off, e.g. [1]. It seems that people got the build working but >> the JIRA that was raised [2] is still outstanding? >> >> Simon >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg01030.html >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2498 >> > > I'm leaving the vote open for a bit in the hope of getting some more > reviews comments. > > The fix in trunk for T2498 has not yet been applied to the 1.3 branch > though from [1] its probably ok to do that now. It wasn't clear if the > problem building binding-ws-axis2 described in that other thread you > reference happens in the 1.3 branch, i'd guess it probably does, and there > is no fix yet in trunk for it. > > Building the tag is just one part of the release so would be nice to get > some more reviews before respining an RC3 in case there are other issues > considered as blocking problems. > > ...ant > > [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/h4rmhiionsjchn54 > > > > Ok, thx ant. I'm just about to look through it. Simon
