On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:54 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Raymond Feng wrote: >> >>> Nice diagrams. >>> >>> We probably should call it something else (such as Invocation Handler >>> Extensibility) as it really goes beyond data transformation. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Raymond >>> >>> >> Exactly. My 2c: Confusing data-binding and invocation-binding/mediation >> will cause trouble. Invocation-mediation is useful, but it'll be better >> addressed separately from data-binding. >> >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> > > Looks like the spec folks might come up with a name for this so how about > we just use whatever they choose: > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200808/msg00036.html > > ...ant > > Good spot ant. So how about "request binding" as a working title for this thread until OASIS do their thing. Simon
