Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:54 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Nice diagrams.
We probably should call it something else (such as
Invocation Handler Extensibility) as it really goes beyond
data transformation.
Thanks,
Raymond
Exactly. My 2c: Confusing data-binding and
invocation-binding/mediation will cause trouble.
Invocation-mediation is useful, but it'll be better addressed
separately from data-binding.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Looks like the spec folks might come up with a name for this so how
about we just use whatever they choose:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200808/msg00036.html
...ant
Good spot ant.
So how about "request binding" as a working title for this thread until
OASIS do their thing.
Simon
What I like about the spec discussion is that if they adopt wireFormat
as the new term, it'll make really clear that operationSelection has
nothing to do with it :)
--
Jean-Sebastien
