On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Simon Laws wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:54 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> >> wrote: >> >> Raymond Feng wrote: >> >> Nice diagrams. >> >> We probably should call it something else (such as >> Invocation Handler Extensibility) as it really goes >> beyond >> data transformation. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> >> Exactly. My 2c: Confusing data-binding and >> invocation-binding/mediation will cause trouble. >> Invocation-mediation is useful, but it'll be better >> addressed >> separately from data-binding. >> >> -- Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> Looks like the spec folks might come up with a name for this >> so how >> about we just use whatever they choose: >> >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200808/msg00036.html >> >> ...ant >> >> >> Good spot ant. >> >> So how about "request binding" as a working title for this >> thread until OASIS do their thing. >> >> Simon >> >> >> What I like about the spec discussion is that if they adopt >> wireFormat as the new term, it'll make really clear that >> operationSelection has nothing to do with it :) >> >> -- Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> I'm not sure what you're getting at or what the smiley implies so could >> you explain a little more? I did intend this thread to include finding a way >> to do operation selection and it looks like the spec thread i linked to >> includes that as well? >> >> ...ant >> > > I'm getting at the fact that the thread started with 'databinding framework > enhancements' and that I think - and have already said in the thread - that: > - operationSelection should be addressed outside of databinding > - enhancing the databinding framework to do operationSelection is not a > good idea. > > The smiley implies that I'm happy that the spec seems to go into the > direction of separating the two. I'm hoping that Tuscany can follow that > guidance from the spec, which is different from what was described in [1]. > > Hope this helps. > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-dev&m=121982857827605 > -- > Jean-Sebastien > The spec thread and issue is titled "Identifying data binding and operation selection" and discusses both of those things, and thats what this thread is about too. The suggestion earlier was for us to use "request binding" as a working title which I'm fine with but I don't mind what we call this stuff for now. ...ant
