Sounds reasonable, we can post back here with the SCA-J TC outcome. ...ant
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mark Combellack <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi ant, > > I would suggest holding off from removing Conversational Service from > Tuscany 2.x for a few days. The reason is that SCA Assembly has agreed to > remove them but the same decision has not yet been made in SCA Java since > SCA Java has not had a call since SCA Assembly made this decision. > > It would seem likely that SCA Java would also remove Conversational > Services > too but it may be worth waiting for the formal decision. > > As co-chair of SCA-J TC, I plan to add an item on the agenda to discuss > this > for the next Java call on Friday. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 21 January 2009 11:44 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: SCA conversations being removed from specs > > > > An interesting resolution at the SCA Assembly TC yesterday - support for > > conversational services is being dropped - see resolution 2009-01-20-2 > at: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200901/msg00066.html > > > > Guess that means we should look at cleaning up all this code in the 2.x > > codebase. > > > > ...ant > > > > >
