Maybe we don't have to do so for M1 as none of the OASIS features have been
added so far.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luciano Resende" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:05 AM
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SCA conversations being removed from specs
Should we remove conversation support from our 2.0-M1 ?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:01 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok thats done, SCA-J are doing the same -
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200901/msg00096.html
...ant
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:32 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
Sounds reasonable, we can post back here with the SCA-J TC outcome.
...ant
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mark Combellack
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi ant,
I would suggest holding off from removing Conversational Service from
Tuscany 2.x for a few days. The reason is that SCA Assembly has agreed
to
remove them but the same decision has not yet been made in SCA Java
since
SCA Java has not had a call since SCA Assembly made this decision.
It would seem likely that SCA Java would also remove Conversational
Services
too but it may be worth waiting for the formal decision.
As co-chair of SCA-J TC, I plan to add an item on the agenda to discuss
this
for the next Java call on Friday.
Thanks,
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 21 January 2009 11:44
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: SCA conversations being removed from specs
>
> An interesting resolution at the SCA Assembly TC yesterday - support
> for
> conversational services is being dropped - see resolution
> 2009-01-20-2
> at:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200901/msg00066.html
>
> Guess that means we should look at cleaning up all this code in the
> 2.x
> codebase.
>
> ...ant
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
