Ok thats done, SCA-J are doing the same - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200901/msg00096.html
...ant On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:32 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable, we can post back here with the SCA-J TC outcome. > > ...ant > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mark Combellack > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi ant, >> >> I would suggest holding off from removing Conversational Service from >> Tuscany 2.x for a few days. The reason is that SCA Assembly has agreed to >> remove them but the same decision has not yet been made in SCA Java since >> SCA Java has not had a call since SCA Assembly made this decision. >> >> It would seem likely that SCA Java would also remove Conversational >> Services >> too but it may be worth waiting for the formal decision. >> >> As co-chair of SCA-J TC, I plan to add an item on the agenda to discuss >> this >> for the next Java call on Friday. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mark >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: 21 January 2009 11:44 >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: SCA conversations being removed from specs >> > >> > An interesting resolution at the SCA Assembly TC yesterday - support for >> > conversational services is being dropped - see resolution 2009-01-20-2 >> at: >> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200901/msg00066.html >> > >> > Guess that means we should look at cleaning up all this code in the 2.x >> > codebase. >> > >> > ...ant >> > >> >> >> >
