Well, I guess the OASIS Open CSA just changed the NS to be used [1], and provided a new set of XSDs. I'll start reviewing what needs to be changed in our side... again...
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200903/msg00077.html On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you expect us to support 3 versions of the SCA specs in Tuscany :-) ? > > I think the <xyz>-xml module should be the aligned with the level of model > in <xyz> module. For example, we have OASIS SCA 1.1 based model in > "assembly", then I imagine that "assembly-xml" has the processors for SCA > 1.1. "<xyz>-xml-<osoa>" will be the compatibility layer (Some Eclipse > plugins use the "compatibility" as part of the ids for similar cases). > > Would the following be a better naming? > > assembly-xml-compatibility-sca10 > > Thanks, > Raymond > > From: Simon Laws > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 8:45 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the > latest OASIS SCA Schemas > > > Hi Raymond > > snip... > > > > For OASIS: org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml > For OSOA: org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.osoa > > > > So what happens when OASIS release a new spec version after v1.1? I don't > know that they will of course but just thinking ahead. > > Simon > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
