Hi Luciano, Thanks for listing them down, I would like to help in the following item....
- Identify changes from new Schema and update respective processors (we could possibly divide here in core, bindings, implementations) like to start with implementations first, and then move to bindings and core. On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > For folks trying to help, couple items could be next : > > - Update the Assembly model based on the new OSOA schemas > - Identify changes from new Schema and update respective processors > (we could possibly divide here in core, bindings, implementations) > - Work on items from the "OASIS versus OSOA delta" items [1] and > choose the ones related to schema/models > > I'll try to get this thread updated with other items as they come to > mind, others please feel free to grab some items or suggest new ones. > > [1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSOA+SCA+vs+OASIS+SCA > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I have completed necessary updates to use the new OASIS namespace and > > schemas released today. > > > > I have found some issues with the schemas released today, and > > workarounded/fixed them in our code. I have also reported these issues > > back to OASIS Spec Group. > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well, I guess the OASIS Open CSA just changed the NS to be used [1], > >> and provided a new set of XSDs. > >> I'll start reviewing what needs to be changed in our side... again... > >> > >> [1] > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200903/msg00077.html > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Do you expect us to support 3 versions of the SCA specs in Tuscany :-) > ? > >>> > >>> I think the <xyz>-xml module should be the aligned with the level of > model > >>> in <xyz> module. For example, we have OASIS SCA 1.1 based model in > >>> "assembly", then I imagine that "assembly-xml" has the processors for > SCA > >>> 1.1. "<xyz>-xml-<osoa>" will be the compatibility layer (Some Eclipse > >>> plugins use the "compatibility" as part of the ids for similar cases). > >>> > >>> Would the following be a better naming? > >>> > >>> assembly-xml-compatibility-sca10 > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Raymond > >>> > >>> From: Simon Laws > >>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 8:45 AM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime > to the > >>> latest OASIS SCA Schemas > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Raymond > >>> > >>> snip... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> For OASIS: org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml > >>> For OSOA: org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.osoa > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> So what happens when OASIS release a new spec version after v1.1? I > don't > >>> know that they will of course but just thinking ahead. > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luciano Resende > >> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
