I have completed necessary updates to use the new OASIS namespace and schemas released today.
I have found some issues with the schemas released today, and workarounded/fixed them in our code. I have also reported these issues back to OASIS Spec Group. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I guess the OASIS Open CSA just changed the NS to be used [1], > and provided a new set of XSDs. > I'll start reviewing what needs to be changed in our side... again... > > [1] > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200903/msg00077.html > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do you expect us to support 3 versions of the SCA specs in Tuscany :-) ? >> >> I think the <xyz>-xml module should be the aligned with the level of model >> in <xyz> module. For example, we have OASIS SCA 1.1 based model in >> "assembly", then I imagine that "assembly-xml" has the processors for SCA >> 1.1. "<xyz>-xml-<osoa>" will be the compatibility layer (Some Eclipse >> plugins use the "compatibility" as part of the ids for similar cases). >> >> Would the following be a better naming? >> >> assembly-xml-compatibility-sca10 >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> From: Simon Laws >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 8:45 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [2.x] Progress update on bringing up Tuscany SCA Runtime to the >> latest OASIS SCA Schemas >> >> >> Hi Raymond >> >> snip... >> >> >> >> For OASIS: org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml >> For OSOA: org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.osoa >> >> >> >> So what happens when OASIS release a new spec version after v1.1? I don't >> know that they will of course but just thinking ahead. >> >> Simon >> > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
