On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:37 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't actually see any serious issues with fixing this by just changing > > the export. It doesn't make much difference if the spring extension > depends > > on implementation-java or implementation-pojo does it? > > > > By doing this, you are allowing modules to have direct dependency on > your implementation artifacts breaking OSGi modularity. As I > mentioned, this would be ok during bring up, but I expect the proper > fix to be available in the future. > > Its not "breaking" anything, its going to be depending on the same code whether its in one module or somewhere else. ...ant
