On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:09 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> It looks good to me, i think its great to have spring working in 2.x. Add >> it to the build! >> >> I'd prefer if the imlementation-spring-xml module was merged into >> implementation-spring as thats the pattern i thought we are using now for >> these. >> >> ...ant >> >> > > Hi Ant, > > I always thought having xxxx-xml module as a good approach, in terms of > spring I see this module as independent module without any dependencies from > spring binaries. Are we following any nomenclature to split the modules? may > be I am not aware. > > I think we did decide to change to the two module approach, there is no real benefit for keeping them separate, I'll go attempt to find an email where this was decided, (not sure how successful that will be as it was sometime ago and might be hard to find searching for -xml). ...ant
