On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:02 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Lets not argue if this is going to be changed anyway, but just labeling
> things "breaking" or "hacking" doesn't make it something true. A valid
> export is what *we* decide is what we want the module to export. Any new
> module is going to use exactly the same export.
>

The new module is supposed to provide interfaces and only export those
packages, hiding it' s implementation details from the consumer, which
I think it' s a good modularity practice.


-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to