On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:13 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:35 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think we've consensus now that instead of having three maven modules >> (model/model-xml/model-runtime) its ok to have the model and model-xml in a >> single module > > It seems that statement may not be true :( > > I think it would be good to be consistent on this across all the Tuscany > modules, right now its an arbitrary mix. > > I'd prefer not keeping the *-xml ones and think thats what we decided back > ages ago (Sebastien's idea i recall though i can't find the emails right > now). Are there any good reasons for not being consistent? or for keeping > any of the *-xml modules? > > You can't use Tuscany without stax. There are no external users I know of > that attempt to use the model modules without the -xml modules, we've always > had some of the xml code in the one module in some of the extensions so if > there are any users doing this then they're handling themselves ok anyway, > and thats probable quite easy as you just need to exclude stax (though this > seems like an obscure usecase to me), so whats the problem? >
Are we talking only about extensions (bindings and implementations) ? For other modules, I'd suggest we check case by case, as I have the same concerns expressed by Raymond on this thread. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
