On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:29 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are we talking only about extensions (bindings and implementations) ? > > I'm suggesting everything. > >> >> For other modules, I'd suggest we check case by case, as I have the >> same concerns expressed by Raymond on this thread. >> > > But what are those concerns? No one has ever given any technical reasons for > keeping them separate that makes sense if we're not doing it consistently. >
Having the xml processors in a separate module would allow us execute the compatibility stuff for 2.x discussed in [1].... [1] http://markmail.org/message/2cez45rwmj43jxwa -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
