On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:29 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are we talking only about extensions (bindings and implementations) ? > > > > I'm suggesting everything. > > > >> > >> For other modules, I'd suggest we check case by case, as I have the > >> same concerns expressed by Raymond on this thread. > >> > > > > But what are those concerns? No one has ever given any technical reasons > for > > keeping them separate that makes sense if we're not doing it > consistently. > > > > Having the xml processors in a separate module would allow us execute > the compatibility stuff for 2.x discussed in [1].... > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/2cez45rwmj43jxwa > > What specifically in there could we not do if the code was in a single module? ...ant
