On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Mike Edwards < [email protected]> wrote:
> Luciano, > > The Spring implementation-xml module is one that I propose we get rid of. > It is one of my "suspicious" ones - it contains a single class only. This > seems very wasteful, as it does not really offer much in the way of > "pluggability". Putting it into the main implementation-spring module > really does simplify things in this case. > > It is notable that the dependencies of the module are all already contained > in the dependencies of implementation-spring, so this will not increase > coupling. > > > Yours, Mike. > Another round of re-factoring with spring module. 1. Removed the implementation-spring-xml module and moved that one class in implementation-spring module. 2. Moved the classes in org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.spring.processor package to implementation-spring-runtime module. 3. Changed the SpringImplementation.java to implement ComponentPreProcessor. -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
