On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:55 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What are the things that are not completely trivial? >> >> As i said in the previous mail the non-trivial ones remaining are: >> binding-ws-xml, contribution-xml, definitions-xml, >> implementation-java-xml, >> interface-java-xml >> > > I'm not sure about definition-xml, but I wouldn't like to see > contribution-xml merged with contribution module. >
Could you explain why you wouldn't like to see this? I've not looked at that model in any detail so that could well be correct but it would be helpful for now or anyone in the future looking for why things are the way they are if the technical reasons for decisions are on the mailing list. ...ant
