On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on Mike's proposal.
Wonderful! > over-engineering. Meanwhile, I really don't think merging functionally > decoupled modules into a fat one is going to reduce spaghetti as it just > hides the spaghetti. I would rather get all the dependencies uncovered and > refactor the code to reduce them to a bare minimum. From OSGi's view, > creating a big bundle that contains everything won't get any benefits such > as modularity, isolations, versioning, or dynamicity promised by OSGi. > No one has suggested "a big bundle that contains everything". I know the module breakdown is a bit of a touchy subject from Tuscany's history thats why i've started all this discussion not just gone off CTR changing things, lets try to forget past prejudices and make it better this time. ...ant
