On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:19 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, ant elder<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Its been nearly 6 weeks since the 2.0 M3 release so should we be >>> thinking about another release? We probably have enough content now - >>> the Assembly otests are nearly all passing, the're a new JSONP >>> binding, and the dynamic domain is starting to come together. So would >>> a M4 in a couple of weeks be doable? Or a bit longer to fit in more? >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> Excellent idea. I think we should update the CHANGES file and see how >> it looks. The SCAClient changes you mention on the other thread [1] >> sound useful to get in. Also I'd like to add the builder tidy and >> basic policy (not including external attachment) support to the list >> as these are in flight and have a chance of being done in the next >> couple of weeks. >> >> Simon >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg09208.html >> > > This is taking longer due to the bringing up the JMS binding taking up > the time and I'm out on vacation for a while so it looks like early > October is now a more realistic date for the M4 release. > > ...ant >
Apachecon is approaching quickly, and it would be good to have a release before the conference. I'd like to finish the porting of the Web 2.0 bindings and get better cloud support ready in the next couple weeks and then help on getting the release out. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
