On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:42 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Ok, how I take an M4 branch towards the end of next week, that gives a >> > bit of time for everyone to make a bit of progress on what they're >> > working on and still gives enough time to make sure M4 gets out before >> > the end of the month. >> > >> > ...ant >> > >> >> Can you give us some heads up one or two days before you cut the >> branch. I want to try to avoid lots of merges if possible. >> >> > > What do people think about delaying M4 till later in next week to give a bit > more time to complete more of the otest work? It seems like both the > assembly and Java CAA otests are really close now so we may be able to get > them all passing if we hold M4 till next week. > > ...ant > >
Ok. I've create a 2.0-M4 JIRA category https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY/fixforversion/12314324 and added JIRAs for the remaining things I'd like to see done in M4. So far thats the 7 JIRAs (5 for SCA-J CAA tests and 2 for the JMS binding), and theres also whatever is remaining for the Assembly compliance tests to add to that. ...ant
